|
|
|
|
|
| |
Flasks of
Gongora superflua '89004' × self |
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Number: |
TN6522 |
| Name: |
Gongora superflua '89004' × self
|
| Type: |
self (What's that?) |
|
No Photos Available
|
|
|
| |
For additional origin/habitat information supplied courtesy of
Charles and Margaret Baker, see further below, near the bottom of this page.
|
Temperatures we attempt to use in the lab & greenhouse:
| For Species: |
|
Spring, Summer, Autumn, Winter: days average 85°F, nights 65°F; best fit is Warm-Intermediate 87-64°F
(Source:
Baker's Web OSC) |
|
About the name...
| Etymology of |
Gongora |
|
Named for Don Antonio Caballero y Góngora, viceroy of New Granada (Colombia) during the 18th century.
(Source:
Pridgeon 1992) |
| Etymology of |
superflua |
|
Means superfluous. It is not known if Reichenbach intended this to mean that this was just a single specimen of a further species of this complex genus.
(Source:
Jenny 1993) |
| Pronunciation of |
Gongora |
|
GON-goe-ra
(Source:
Pridgeon 1992) |
|
If you would like to direct someone to this web page, please copy and paste this URL into your email:
http://troymeyers.com/d?016522
| Flask Information |
| Availability: |
There were problems with this item and we weren't able to make any viable flasks. |
| You should: |
Consider placing a "Notify Retries" Request, and if an identical pollination (the same parents) is done again, we'll let you know. |
|
You might also want to:
|
View the seed assay for this item.
View items of the same species.
View items of the same genus.
|
|
|
| |
The origin/habitat information below is supplied courtesy of Charles and Margaret Baker
The following information is based on the name of the plant provided by the donor, and assumes that the name is correct. If the plant has been misidentified, then the following information may not be correct.
This text is copyrighted by the Bakers and may not be reproduced without permission.
ORIGIN/HABITAT: Ecuador. The type specimen was found on the eastern slopes
of the Andes near Loja in southern Ecuador. Although formally described in
1874, Jenny (1993) stated that no further finds have been recorded, and it
is unlikely that it is in cultivation at this time.
More about this information and the Bakers...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
